White Rock Creek

Virginian
Countryside,
and Folky Art

lunarblue21:

xcgirl08:

shoujofeels:

becausetheinternet:

A 2500 year old mummy that had some amazing tattoos.

WHAT.

NO FUCKING WAY.

YO HOLD ON. 

IT GETS BETTER.

This mummy, found in the  Altai mountains of Siberia, is actually that of a young woman who died at about the age of twenty-five; she is thought to have been a member of the Pazyryk tribe.

She was buried with six horses and two similarly-tattooed men (the horned griffon that decorates her shoulder also appears on the man buried closest to her, covering most of his right side), possibly escorts. She was also wearing a horse-hair wig, silk, and elaborate boots, which is all a level of ceremony that would have likely only been accorded to a woman of high rank. You didn’t get inked like this unless you were very important, and had worked your way up to that importance. 

…Hence, of course, the references to her by researchers as ‘The Ukok Princess,’ although due to the lack of weapons in her grave they have concluded that the woman was in fact a healer or a storyteller.  

And now I’m all consumed with curiosity: Who was she? What amazing things did she accomplish? Why these symbols, and what did they mean? Who were the two men alongside her?

The most informative article about it can be found here, although I would completely eat up any other information you guys could find. 

#awesome stuff #history 

Oooh the Altai Mountains…. 

(via concinne)

For whom, then, is the book intended? That is the trouble. Unless I can say, “For those, young or old, who like the things which I like,” I find it difficult to answer. Is it a children’s book? Well, what do we mean by that? Is The Wind in the Willows a children’s book? Is Alice in Wonderland? Is Treasure Island? These are masterpieces which we read with pleasure as children, but with how much more pleasure when we are grown-up. In any case, what do we mean by “children”? A boy of three, a girl of six, a boy of ten, a girl of fourteen - are they all to like the same thing? And is a book “suitable for a boy of twelve” any more likely to please a boy of twelve than a modern novel is likely to please a man of thirty-seven; even if the novel be described truly as “suitable for a man of thirty-seven”? I confess that I cannot grapple with these difficult problems. But I am very sure of this: that no one can write a book which children will like, unless he write it for himself first. That being so, I shall say boldly that this is a story for grown-ups. […] But, as you see, I am still finding it difficult to explain just what sort of book it is. Perhaps no explanation is necessary. Read in it what you like; read it to whomever you like; be of what age you like; it can only fall into one of the two classes. Either you will enjoy it, or you won’t.
It is that sort of book.

-A.A. Milne about his awesome charming book Once on a Time.

march walk

unwinona:

iwanttoseethestarsdoctor:

Did anyone else read Sideways Stories from Wayside School as a kid?

image

I remember one story about a new kid who smells horrible and wears a big coat and is an all around jerk.  The kids have had enough of his shit so they start pulling off his coat, only to find another coat, and another, and eventually they get to a little tiny coat and when they pull it off the kid is just a dead rat and they go gross and throw it out the window.  The end.  

These books were fucking awesome.

(Source: theywillliveagaininfreedom)


The unicorn in captivity. Wool warp with wool, silk, silver, and gilt wefts, 368 cm x 251,5 cm; 1495-1505. New York, Metropolitan Museum of Art.

The unicorn in captivity. Wool warp with wool, silk, silver, and gilt wefts, 368 cm x 251,5 cm; 1495-1505. New York, Metropolitan Museum of Art.

(Source: studiolo2, via concinne)

at the auto auction

at the auto auction